.png)
Understanding Negative Gearing and Its Potential Impact on Australia's Rental Market
- T.K.
- 2 days ago
- 5 min read
Updated: 1 day ago
In Australia, negative gearing is a term that frequently comes up in discussions about the housing market. It's a strategy that can impact both property investors and tenants significantly. As the government contemplates changes to this tax approach, it is vital to understand what negative gearing is and how it could reshape the landscape of rentals across the country.
Negative gearing allows rental property facilitators to deduct expenses linked to their rental properties from their taxable income. This means if the expenses, such as maintenance and mortgage repayments, exceed the rental income generated, the investor can offset these losses against their overall income. Consequently, this reduces their tax bill, which can be appealing for many investors.
What is Negative Gearing?
Negative gearing permits investors who facilitate private rental properties both residential & commercial, to deduct property-related expenses from their gross income, leading to increased financial deductions.
Common expenses that can be claimed include:
Repairs and maintenance costs
Strata levies and property management fees
Interest on the bank loan, council rates, rental advertising
In some cases, utilities if they are covered by the owner
For many property owners, especially those with mortgages, the financial terrain can be treacherous.
Investors can easily find themselves in the red after accounting for costs and interest on the bank loan, which alone can lead to thousands of dollars in expenses annually.
For instance, consider an apartment in the heart of Sydney with an $800,000 mortgage, the interest alone can be as much as $48,000, whilst the rent would be in the vicinity of $680pw.
When combined with council rates, insurance, and maintenance & adhering to various rules and regulations can significantly reduce the profitability of owning a property. Without the benefits of negative gearing, the appeal of owning a property to rent out diminishes.
Property owners have limited control over many aspects of their property, even though their name is on the title. They must comply with tenancy laws, strata laws, fire safety requirements, and occupational health and safety regulations.
The Responsibilities of Property Owners
Owning a rental property entails several responsibilities that extend beyond simply collecting rental income.
Repairs impacting different aspects of a rental property must be completed promptly & up to standard, unlike in your own home where you can delay some repairs according to your budget & do endless DIY on it.
According to Australian rental laws, landlords can only increase rents once per year, and the adjustments in rent must be reasonable. Moreover, tenants cannot be evicted without a valid reason, which complicates matters for property owners.
Landlords must also adhere to various regulations, including strata by-laws and council rules.
Strata levies must be paid without fail and strata buildings often have repairs and renovations present & future that can cost thousands a year.
These levies if not paid, incur interest & can lead to issues with debt recovery.
Insurance coverage is required if you have a loan on the property. And due to both local and global disasters, insurance companies have passed their losses onto consumers by raising many premiums across the board.
So whether you are ready , willing or able as an investor many of your bills are mandatory & there is no lenience, downtime or excuses. You have to pay.
The Impact of Potential Changes to Negative Gearing
If the government follows through on altering negative gearing, the consequences could be wide-ranging for the rental market.
A removal or unfavourable adjustment of negative gearing could reduce the number of investment properties on the market. This decrease may worsen the existing housing crisis, making it even tougher for renters to find affordable homes. Data reveals that during previous changes to tax laws, the rental market saw up to a tremendous drop in available properties within six months.
Moreover, if property owners lose the ability to claim losses against their taxable income, many may change their investment strategies. This could lead to an uptick in rental prices as landlords aim to cover their costs without the tax benefits they previously relied on. As interest rates rise, coupled with increased costs of maintenance, landlords might have no choice but to pass these expenses on to renters.
Otherwise, abandon the rental facilitation entirely and turn it over to the government, which would then face increased pressure to produce significantly more social housing at a faster pace.
The Broader Economic Implications
Changes to negative gearing won't only impact property owners and tenants; they also carry broader economic implications.
A decline in the availability of investment properties could harm the construction industry, which is pivotal for job creation and economic growth. Rising rental prices could exacerbate financial pressures on households and increase demands for social housing. For instance, a 10% increase in rental prices in major cities could lead to thousands more families seeking government assistance.
Which, in turn, could lead to tax increases, as the government only has a limited amount of money to distribute.
Additionally, the health of the housing market is closely linked to consumer confidence. If potential investors perceive the market as less attractive due to changes in negative gearing policies, they may hesitate to invest further, which could stall sector growth.
Provide even less rental accommodation and less support for growing and sustaining businesses in commercial properties.
Furthermore, commercial properties, in which many people have invested and benefit from the relief provided by negative gearing, will either lose these advantages or see them diminished. It's evident that numerous small and medium-sized businesses, which are tenants in these commercial properties, cannot afford potential rent increases that might arise if negative gearing is modified, leading to rent hikes to recover the financial losses faced by property owners.
Consider local hairdressers, boutiques, bakers, news agencies, manufacturers, importers, and others— potential they may pass cost increases onto the consumer, unless they are compelled to close down entirely.
Some might argue that the advantage would be investors selling properties, allowing small and medium business owners to buy them. However, would they actually be able to? Many businesses might not want such a commitment, it might not align with their business plans, and they might not be able to afford the purchase.
Final Thoughts on Negative Gearing
Negative gearing represents a complex and often misunderstood facet of the Australian rental market.
Without contribution and commitment from private investors the rental landscape would be significantly lacking in rental properties.
As the government considers potential changes to this tax policy, recognizing the possible effects on property owners, tenants, and the wider economy is crucial.
While the motivation behind modifying negative gearing may be to create a fairer housing market & more revenue, the implications could be substantial & not really beneficial on a larger scale or the long term.
As these discussions unfold, it is essential for property owners, tenants, and policymakers to participate in meaningful dialogue. This ensures that any modifications made to negative gearing take into account the various needs of the community at large. A balanced strategy is vital for supporting both investors and renters, fostering a healthier rental market.
And exploring other options such as boosting government contribution & infrastructure to regional areas that are plentiful but undervalued and under developed & boosting small & medium business growth and expansion.
